The Atheist Experience

It's gonna be a disorganized page, but it's past due. date issss... 2026-02-12

I'm gonna yap about ATHEIST SILLYMEN.

The sillyman has a double-meaning. It is defined(by me) both as 1- a standard strawman with extra-faggy, ridiculous language used by atheists to commit a personal incredulity fallacy. Skydaddy, jewish zombies, etc. and also 2- an atheist that is silly even *beyond* their atheism, and probably often because of it (just some fun examples off my head are like, Matt Dillahunty pretending his boyfriend is a woman and encouraging the guy's delusion--apparently wasted $10,000 on fake tits, something even actual women should not be doing--The Amazing Atheist shoving a banana up his ass and sending it to a girl he didn't even know for her to leak it to the Internet, and saying he wanted to rpe babies in a now-deleted tweet, and uh... Dillahunty's co-host speaking at a Satanist convention wearing BDSM gear--these are actually all things, besides not being at all healthy for a "secular humanist" to be engaged in, are curtailed by the acknowledgement of sin)

The reason atheists commit sillymen, and are sillymen, is that they cannot cope with God. It's a gorillion times easier to dismiss a "bearded wizard who lives in the sky and grants your wishes" than God. "B-b-but that's literally what you believe!" they will cry in protest. Is it though? No, of course it's not, you're being an obtuse retard on purpose.

When Matt Dillahunty scoffs and asks Trent Horn "Erm, you believe virgins can give birth?" it sounds like, and he wants it to sound like, he's asking if any woman can reproduce asexually. It's equating everyday women with one woman God chose to birth the Messiah. It conveniently leaves out that the birth of Christ is a unique, miraculous event caused by God, because it's really easy to look at all the women alive today and laugh at the idea of any of them even being virgins in the first place, let alone them actually claiming to have gotten pregnant without having sex.

Of course the same goes for the Resurrection. Just the other day, I saw some poor dimwit say "People rising from the dead is bullshit", as if Christians believe The Walking Dead is real, rather than the resurrection of God himself and Christ's unique power--as God--to raise the dead.

A lot of times they don't realize they're doing it. But that's just like, an IQ issue. "I believe God made a virgin give birth" "SO YOU'RE SAYING VIRGINS CAN GIVE BIRTH?" Well--is that really what I said? You fucking retard? It's like that "lobster" woman uh... Jordan Peterson debated who just kept repeating "So what you're saying is..." for 30 minutes and it was a bizarrely obtuse strawman literally every single time. As if she didn't really want to have to cope with what he was saying. The way that atheists don't want to cope with God. They'd much rather place the burden of miracles on *humans*.

If you believe in God, it makes sense to believe in God performing miracles. None of it is seems more extreme than the creation of the Universe. Of course an objection to that would be "Erm, well ackshually a virgin birth IS harder to believe than the Universe coming from nothing, because we know that the Universe exists, but I've never seen a virgin give birth." And that's kiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinda heckin valid, except that I really have no way of knowing that it just makes perfect sense for the Universe to exist at all, never mind to have come from nothing. That's really just something you're claiming. I get that the Universe is here, and I get that *you* don't believe in God, but when you say retarded nonsense like "How convenient that the Universe is just like it'd be if there was no God", that's a claim with no reference point. I doubt that you have a godless control-Universe to show me that looks identical to ours.

It's like the way they say a "Flying Spaghetti Monster" "makes more sense" than God because we know that spaghetti exists. But we also know, as well as we can know anything, that spaghetti isn't sentient and doesn't fly. So I reject that claim, it sounds fucking retarded sry. You know I used to own a Flying Spaghetti Monster necklace? God help me, I hate myself.

When I was an atheist, there was one theist argument I didn't like that went something like... if you found a clock in the forest, having never seen a clock, you'd know that it was designed, and so the same can be true of the Universe. It seems designed, so it probably is. And I didn't like that argument, because I figured "How can you possibly know that? If you believed the clock was designed, it'd obviously be because you've seen similar objects that you know to be designed." Now the entire argument just seems pointless because *all* of it, including the forest, seems designed anyway 😪️

what was I talking about? I'm getting off track... that entire last paragraph wasn't really relevantI'm ending it here.

When an atheist tries to use sillyman wordgames against you, consider not letting them. It's okay for you to state that you don't think God is Dumbledore sitting on a cloud, and maybe they should be questioned why they want or need to imagine God as a wizard while they have no trouble swallowing "incomprehensible" as a descriptor in an HP Lovecraft story or "wibbly-wobbly timey-whimey" or literally anything that a physicist says, ever, except "I believe there's a God."

But what about *being* sillymen? Idk, who cares lmao-- it's not like, rocket science. Sam Harris has been trying to "nuh-uh" this for over a decade: if you don't believe in God, you're more likely to be a complete disgusting, unhealthy freak, because you have no reason not to be. No matter how much you may say you're a "secular humanist", you're really just a hedonist, and it's very hard to blame you because pleasure is pleasurable. But having shame is a good thing, actually. It keeps your ego grounded, makes you more sociable-- makes you a better "humanist" than you could be otherwise. What have the studies shown? Some absurd discrepencies in things ranging from charity to relationship health to and mental health in general. You can cope and say "that's just a placebo", but if you actually cared about humanity (you don't, you want to waste $10,000 that could feed multiple families for months, on fake tits), you'd take the "placebo" like Richard "Cultural Christian" Dawkins has. Come home, Richard.

I think that's the end of the page for now. sry it's disorganized & sry it's a little mean. pls take care,God bless